Schools Are Tracking YOUR Child’s Mental Health – Whether YOU Like It or Not

Whether it’s security cameras, armed guards, or psychological screenings, mass schooling is becoming increasingly prison-like.

A worrying trend is emerging in schools across the country. With increasing regularity, school districts are tracking students’ mental health and raising flags if a screening shows something amiss.

Sacrificing Freedom for Perceived Safety
Student mental health tracking is often framed in terms of safety or prevention—that all kids should be screened to identify the few who could potentially serve as a danger to themselves or others. Last week, NPR reported that in Florida, all students who registered for public school this fall were required to disclose their mental health history. Has the child ever seen a therapist? That information must be revealed as a condition of school registration.

This mental health tracking measure is part of the response to the mass school shooting in Parkland, Florida, in February that left 17 people dead. The high school where the shooting took place instituted heightened safety measures this school year, including 52 new security cameras, automatically locking classroom doors, and more armed guards.

Some of these enhanced security measures, as well as the mental health history disclosures, are not at the discretion of individual schools or districts. They are now Florida law. Troubled by the Parkland shooting, state lawmakers recently passed legislation requiring more armed guards at public schools and mandating mental health disclosures on public school registration forms. The new Florida statute spotlights the willingness of many citizens to give up personal liberty in exchange for an increase in perceived government security.

According to the NPR article, the Florida law is particularly concerning to parents with special needs children. One mom with a young child on the autism spectrum told NPR: “If you do say, ‘Yes, my child has seen a counselor or a therapist or a psychologist,’ what does the school then do with that?”

Secret Psychological Surveillance
Florida may be the most recent example of public schools monitoring students’ mental health, but the practice is widespread—and often surreptitious. A Wall Street Journal article written last year by a New Hampshire physician blew the lid off secret school screenings of mental health. In her article, Dr. Aida Cerundolo wrote: “Educators and administrators increasingly are using psychological screening tools to identify children who are at risk for social and emotional issues, and to assess programs geared toward improving social and emotional skills.”

Many of these screening tests are administered to schoolchildren without the parents’ knowledge or consent. Dr. Cerundolo suggests that the intent of these screenings may be well-meaning in terms of helping struggling students receive necessary mental health services, but the negative impact on privacy is large. She asked: “What is the privacy cost to students who are not at risk for a psychological imbalance, yet whose mental-health information is being documented by teachers and tracked over time?”

Whether it’s security cameras, armed guards, or psychological screenings, mass schooling is becoming increasingly prison-like. It’s no wonder, then, that there is now a quiet exodus from these institutions as more parents seek to take back control of their children’s education. Rather than tolerating invasive privacy breaches and state intrusions on personal matters, many parents are opting out of government schooling in favor of homeschooling and other private school options. As schools continue to erode individual freedoms, parents will continue to walk away.

Written by Kerry McDonald for Foundation for Economic Education ~ September 30, 2018

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.