Publisher’s NOTE: For those readers who have been familiar with me for some years, they are aware of my penchant for ‘fishing.’ My schedule has been quite perplexing for the past couple of weeks, and although I attempt to keep our various web-sites up to date – it is not always easy to do so – and hence – a fishing ‘trip’ was in order. We’ll be back to full attack mode in a few more days. Until then – join me at the river, won’t you? Oh – and the piece posted below from March 2015 by Phil Power – is the PERFECT example of life’s analogies. ~ J.B.
I’m coming to a conclusion as I age: Mathematics, political behavior and plain common sense all demonstrate that extremes generally don’t accurately reflect long-term reality.
When you apply this notion to politics, it suggests that neither hard-right Tea Partiers nor flaming left liberals are likely to dominate our political system — or provide sensible answers. It’s the generally centrist “sanity caucus” that most times winds up calling the shots.
Nationally, we are apt to see people and candidates divide along these lines during next year’s presidential campaign. One example: As a rough generalization, right-wingers think people who fall behind in things like academic performance or income should be trying harder and doing better, and deserve punishment for not doing so. Those on the left generally think people on the bottom can’t be helped except by redistributing resources to them.
But centrists reason that the best way to help people and society as a whole is by investing in human capital — things like access to early childhood and university education — which increase individual opportunity for all… Continue reading →