Revealed: Teaching is political, it’s advocacy – it’s not educational

Dr. Michael L. Brown

Parents aren’t sending their children to school to be indoctrinated by politically correct teachers – and the educational industry has no business pressuring teachers or students or parents to conform to its leftist ideologies. Yet that’s exactly what’s happening.

If you ever wondered if our children’s educational system was politically biased, then look no further than the NEA. It is unashamedly leftist, aggressively for abortion, decidedly pro-LGBT, and unapologetically hostile to those who dare challenge the status quo. (Most recently, see here for the NEA’s abortion advocacy.)

Still, we are sometimes blissfully (and even willfully) ignorant of just how politicized our children’s schools can be. But this email, sent to me by a school teacher, the wife of a Facebook friend, will help shock us back to reality. (We’ll call her Sarah.)

Sadly, I have heard an endless stream of similar stories for years now. This is just the freshest in my mind.

Sarah copied a tweet from another teacher, then wrote:

Hello Dr. Brown. This is what has happened to my profession. Please note the rainbow flag and how many likes this received. I can tell you that this not isolated. I’m a K-6 teacher who has taught public school in Florida, Nevada, and California. It is pervasive. I now teach through a public virtual charter school which allows parents more voice. At my last teaching position before I moved to the charter, the principal called a staff meeting where he told us that we would teach LGBTQ “inclusion” beginning in Kindergarten, that he believed one of our Pre-K students may be LGBTQ because for “Dress like a prince or princess day” she wanted to be a prince. Also in this staff meeting he let us know that if a student OR a parent had a problem with us teaching LGBTQ that we should send them to the principal’s office so he could “tell them how they are wrong.” Can you imagine being a Christian Kindergartner being sent to the principal’s office to be bullied into LGBTQ submission? This is why I encourage everyone I speak with to homeschool, or choose an alternative form of schooling if they can.

Yes, this is the kind of pressure Sarah was under teaching in an elementary school. (One first-grade teacher talked to me about the pro-LGBT pressure she was under, explaining that to resist it was to lose her job – teaching first grade!) Can you imagine what the atmosphere is like in high-schools?

The tweet Sarah was referring to was posted by Jed Dearbury and read:

“New teachers, I’m sorry if we veteran educators have misguided you about the profession. It’s not about cute classrooms & trendy ideas. It’s political. It’s advocacy. It’s the front line of battle for the future of our nation. Go no further if you’re not ready.”

Related Dearbury tweets included: “If your definition of teacher leadership doesn’t include actively being a voice for marginalized students, it’s past time to rewrite your philosophy.”

And, “If the reason you don’t like to speak up on social justice issues on social media is because this account is your ‘professional educator’ account, Guess what … professional educators should be advocating for social justice because students are counting you to do so.”

Now, I fully understand that, from Dearbury’s perspective, he is doing the right thing. The noble thing. The courageous thing.

He believes it is his duty, along with the duty of other educators, to get political and to advocate for social justice causes, not just in the classroom but on social media and elsewhere.

And I imagine that if he and I ever sat down together, he would explain to me why teachers must stand up for perceived LGBT rights and other socially divisive causes. In his words, “It’s the front line of battle for the future of our nation.”

I understand he feels that way, and I have no desire to demonize him as a person.

I simply reject, his premises – categorically and from the heart.

First, parents are not sending their children to school to be indoctrinated by politically correct teachers. They’re not sending their kids to discover the definition of gender queer. Or to hear a revisionist retelling of American history. Or to understand the evils of toxic masculinity. Or to master the intricacies of intersectionality.

They’re sending their kids to learn to read and write and do math. To get a grasp of geography and science and world literature. To learn about George Washington and Abraham Lincoln (without speculating on their sexuality – yes, there are gay activists who want to claim both of them as gay!).

Second, the educational industry has no business pressuring teachers or students or parents to conform to its leftist ideologies.

Really now, why on earth should the NEA take a public stance on abortion, for example? What does this have to do with the so-called three R’s?

The NEA even has a LGBTQ+ caucus, which, “in order to eliminate institutional discrimination and homophobia, monitors and participates in the development of NEA policies and activities, provides resources and fosters better communication among educators, students, and communities.”

NEA insiders have told me that, for many years now, groups like this have been so deeply entrenched in the NEA that any who dare resist their goals are quickly blocked and marginalized. (You can be assured that it doesn’t take much to be branded “homophobic” or “transphobic” in these circles.)

Third, we see just how destructive and ugly today’s sex-ed curricula have become, pushing virtually-pornographic filth on our children. (For recent developments in California, see here.)

This is what happens when schools get political, and it’s just one example of many. They are not just teaching our children. They are going to indoctrinate them.

The left understands that the schools are the “front line of battle for the future of our nation.” The question is: Do we?

If so, then what are we going to do about it?

At the least, we need to continue to come up with alternative solutions (from homeschooling to private schools and charter schools). We need to continue to get involved in the public school system, from administration to teaching to parental meetings with educators. And we need to say to the left in no uncertain terms, “You will not use our children as political pawns!”

Let the righteous pushback continue. This is the front lines of the battle for the future of our nation.

Written by Dr. Michael L. Brown and published by ONE News NOW ~ July 25, 2019

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

2 thoughts on “Revealed: Teaching is political, it’s advocacy – it’s not educational

  1. Rick Bonner

    Very well said, Granny – and well written, too. I dare venture to say, you’re penmanship is probably as coherent!

    May I add, on another ‘fractal’?

    The Prussian General, von Clausewitz, the guy who coined the phrase “… the fog o’ war…” said, “War is state diplomacy, extended and carried to the (artificially artificed, conjured up, formerly agricultural fields and villages, now, transformed into) battle field.”

    Now to me, as it seems to Dr. Michael Brown…, that’s some pretty badly twisted ‘politics’.

    And as for Principal Dearbury, as edja-mick-ate-ed as he is, social and political analysts have an eons long name for him, and his sort, “useful idiots”. Sincere, well meaning, compassionate even, idiots. Critically useful – to the point of being essential – idiots nescessary to the Purposeful dis-memberment of any healthy society. Since before Cicero, not every True enemy of beneficial, healthy-for-all, God-pleasing states were wicked-hearted; some o’ us are jus’ ignore-ant. Or, down right stupid.

    Reply
  2. Jeffrey Post author

    The above column was submitted to me by ‘Granny’ along with her forwarding comments, which we post here. ~ Ed.

    I saw the *beginning* of this when I was in 10th grade and the school district hired a new teacher (younger and more *friendly*) for the English classes. I made a fool of his *style* in class as even then I knew he was not the kind of *teacher* I had had prior to that year. He worked too hard to be our *friend* than to educate us on the basics to take us thru our lives.

    My next big eye opener was when my two oldest daughters were in grade school and the district changed from letter grade report cards to parent teacher conferences. I was in my mid twenties at the time and the teachers weren’t really any older than I was. I had saved the kids papers to take to the conferences and I had scheduled them one after the other so I wouldn’t miss too much time from my job. The first one(which was repeated almost word for word with the second one) had the ‘teacher’ telling me how much she enjoyed my daughter in class and all sorts of good comments. Then she asked me if I had any questions. Well, YES I sure do and I placed that daughters papers on the table in front of her and asked her to please explain the *grade* she gave for that paper. This was before the Happy Face drawings by the grade. She couldn’t understand my question as the *grade* was an A or A-. I asked how she knew what to grade when it was almost impossible to read what was written. Her comment – which I shall NEVER FORGET — Oh Mrs Juntti, we don’t grade on handwriting we grade on CONTENT. – my response – How do you know what the CONTENT is if you can’t read it?? her response (the killer) – Oh Mrs. Juntti, you just don’t understand, you are just a parent.

    I then went to the next meeting with the next teacher and the entire scene was repeated almost word for word right to the you just don’t understand, Mrs Juntti, you are just a parent.

    From that day forward I worked and voted against every school levy that hit the ballot and I also worked hard to get conservative board members elected to the school board. We won a few but in the long term we lost … BIG TIME – but the biggest losers were the kids who had no clue they were being CHEATED and indoctrinated to be obedient little ONE WORLD ORDER workers.

    I can’t imagine having one of my children in todays public (and private in some cases) schools. They have trained up a couple generations of obedient slaves who think SEX is far more important than civics.. as we see in todays Congress (the Modern Day Jezebels and the pedophiles of both sexes and tranny’s).

    Jackie Juntti (Granny)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.